Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1038

reference
952-tree-1
name
1038
tree-preservation-order

undefined

952-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.022887 50.876142)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.022773 50.876130,-1.022778 50.876153,-1.022794 50.876173,-1.022819 50.876189,-1.022850 50.876199,-1.022885 50.876203,-1.022921 50.876200,-1.022952 50.876190,-1.022978 50.876174,-1.022994 50.876154,-1.023001 50.876132,-1.022995 50.876110,-1.022980 50.876090,-1.022955 50.876074,-1.022923 50.876063,-1.022888 50.876059,-1.022853 50.876063,-1.022821 50.876073,-1.022796 50.876088,-1.022779 50.876108,-1.022773 50.876130)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL